The Jungle and the Progressive Era
by Robert Cherny
The publication of Upton Sinclair's 1906 novel The Jungle produced
an immediate and powerful effect on Americans and on federal policy, but
Sinclair had hoped to achieve a very different result. At the time he
began working on the novel, he had completed his studies at Columbia University
and was trying to develop a career as an author. He had been born in Baltimore
in 1878, but his family had moved to the Bronx in 1888. Though he came
from a prominent family, his own parents had little money, and he paid
for his university studies by writing dime novels and short stories. While
at Columbia, he also became a convert to socialism.
At the time, journalists had begun to play an important role in exposing
wrong doing. Around 1902, magazine publishers discovered that their sales
soared when they featured exposés of political corruption, corporate
misconduct, or other offenses. McClure's Magazine led the way, in October
1902, with a series by Lincoln Steffens that revealed corruption in city
governments. In January 1903, McClure's carried Steffens's installment
on Minneapolis, launched a new series by Ida Tarbell on Standard Oil,
and featured an article on corruption in labor unions. McClure's sales
boomed, and other publications quickly commissioned exposés of
their own.
In 1904, the leading socialist weekly in the country, The Appeal to Reason,
offered Sinclair $500 (equivalent to about $11,500 in 2008) to prepare
an exposé on the meatpacking industry. Upon arriving in his hotel
in Chicago, Sinclair is said to have announced, "I am Upton Sinclair,
and I have come to write the Uncle Tom's Cabin of the labor movement."
For seven weeks, he prowled the streets of Packingtown, the residential
district next to the stockyards and packing plants. He donned overalls,
posed as a worker, and slipped into the packing plants to gain first-hand
knowledge of the work. He sought out social workers, police officers,
physicians, and others who could tell him about life and work in Packingtown.
Local socialists introduced him to other people who were knowledgeable
about the community and the work. At the end of seven weeks, he returned
home to New Jersey, shut himself up in a small cabin, and wrote for nine
months.
The book he produced, The Jungle, followed a fictional family
of Lithuanian immigrants in Chicago. From an opening chapter that recounts
the joyous wedding of the main character, Jurgis Rudkus, Sinclair traced
the family's experience with work in Packingtown. In the process, he exposed
in disgusting detail the inner workings of the meatpacking industry:
They were regular alchemists at Durham's; they advertised a
mushroom-catsup, and the men who made it did not know what a mushroom
looked like. They advertised 'potted chicken' . . . the things that went
into the mixture were tripe, and the fat of pork, and beef suet, and hearts
of beef, and finally the waste ends of veal, when they had any. They put
these up in several grades, and sold them at several prices; but the contents
of the cans all came out of the same hopper. And then there was 'potted
game' and 'potted grouse,' 'potted ham,' and 'deviled ham'--de-vyled,
as the men called it. 'De-vyled' ham was made out of the waste ends of
smoked beef that were too small to be sliced by the machines; and also
tripe, dyed with chemicals so that it would not show white; and trimmings
of hams and corned beef; and potatoes, skins and all; and finally the
hard cartilaginous gullets of beef, after the tongues had been cut out.
All this ingenious mixture was ground up and flavored with spices to make
it taste like something.
Sinclair described the afflictions of packinghouse workers, from severed
fingers to tuberculosis and blood poisoning. He wrote of men who "fell
into the vats; and when they were fished out, there was never enough left
of them to be worth exhibiting--sometimes they would be overlooked for
days, till all but the bones of them had gone out to the world as Durham's
Pure Leaf Lard!" And he told of scheming real estate salemen and
crooked politicians.
At the center of the story, Sinclair recounts the destruction of Jurgis's
family because of the corrupt, exploitative, and oppressive nature of
work and life in Packingtown. Finally Jurgis is left alone, stripped of
all dignity. One evening, he wanders into a meeting hall to escape the
cold, hears a speech on socialism, and becomes an ardent convert to that
cause. The final section of the novel features arguments for socialism,
in the form of speeches that Jurgis hears. The book ends with a socialist
orator's impassioned appeal to "Organize! Organize! Organize!"
so that "Chicago will be ours! Chicago will be ours! CHICAGO WILL
BE OURS!"
Sinclair's work broke with the mold established by previous exposés
in two ways. First, his was a work of fiction that followed one family
over a period of years and, in the process, detailed unsanitary food preparation,
exploitation of workers, sleazy real-estate practices, political corruption,
and much more. Second, where many previous authors had suggested that
the reform of the abuses they described could be accomplished by the election
of honest men, Sinclair had a larger goal: the rejection of capitalism
and the victory of socialism. He intended that his readers would recognize
that the horrors portrayed in his book were the result of corporate greed
and exploitation and that the meatpacking industry was but a microcosm
of capitalism—that the jungle was actually industrial capitalism.
In the serialized version, he states: "the place which is here called
The Jungle is not Packingtown, nor is it Chicago, nor is it Illinois,
nor is it the United States—it is Civilization."
In late February 1905, the Appeal to Reason began to publish Sinclair's
work as a serial, one chapter per week, and the paper's sales boomed to
175,000 per issue. Between April and October, the complete version also
appeared in four installments in a small, socialist, quarterly magazine
called One-Hoss Philosophy. The novel drew praise from prominent Socialists,
including the best-selling novelist Jack London. But Sinclair wanted his
work to reach the widest possible audience. Just as Steffens's and Tarbell's
works had appeared as books, so Sinclair intended his novel to be a book.
He first approached Macmillan, the publisher of his previous novel, a
Civil War story called Manassas. Though initially interested,
Macmillan eventually backed off. According to Sinclair, five other publishers
did the same. As he went to publisher after publisher, he was also revising
the version that had appeared in serial form, trimming it, removing duplicative
material, modifying the final chapters, improving his use of Lithuanian
phrases, and modifying material that might have invited a lawsuit for
libel. Discouraged about finding a publisher, he finally asked the readers
of The Appeal to Reason to contribute funds to enable him to publish it
himself. Just as he was about to begin his self-publishing venture, he
received an acceptance from Doubleday, Page and Company.
Like other publishers, Doubleday had been concerned for the possibility
of legal liability if the packing companies were to sue. Their offer to
publish was contingent on their ability to verify the truth of Sinclair's
descriptions of the packing plants. One of their editors went to Chicago
and interviewed a former governmental meat inspector, who confirmed that
Sinclair's version was not exaggerated. Not satisfied, the editor secured
an inspector's badge and prowled through the vast packing plants. His
conclusion: things were as bad as Sinclair had reported, maybe worse.
The book was released on January 25, 1906, and created an international
sensation, selling 25,000 copies in six weeks. It has never been out of
print and was made into a movie in 1913.
The stir created by The Jungle quickly reached all the way to
the White House. The nation's leading political humorist, Finley Peter
Dunne, who wrote in the character of a Chicago saloonkeeper named Mr.
Dooley, imagined the reaction of President Theodore Roosevelt:
Tiddy was toying with a light breakfast an' idly turnin' over
th' pages iv th' new book with both hands. Suddenly he rose fr'm th' table,
an' cryin': 'I'm pizened,' began throwin' sausages out iv th' window.
. . . Since thin th' Prisidint, like th' rest iv us, has become a viggytaryan.
In fact, Roosevelt behaved quite differently. His first reaction was
to consult with the Agriculture Department, which reported that meatpacking
was carefully inspected and meat was safe to eat. Roosevelt then wrote
to Frank Doubleday, berating him for publishing "such an obnoxious
book." Doubleday replied that his company had confirmed Sinclair's
descriptions. Roosevelt launched his own investigation, which confirmed,
in Roosevelt's words, that "the method of handling and preparing
food products is uncleanly and dangerous to health," but he announced
only that he had the report and did not release its contents.
Congress at the time was considering a pure-food-and-drug bill, the result
of a series of earlier exposés of patent medicines and impure foods
as well as continued lobbying by Harvey Wiley of the Bureau of Chemistry
in the Agriculture Department and pressure from such groups as the American
Medical Association. Roosevelt himself, in his 1905 message to Congress,
had recommended action on the subject. However, conservative opposition
to any regulation combined with opposition from drug and food-processing
companies seemed likely to defeat the bill. The public outcry created
by The Jungle changed the dynamic in Congress. The Senate approved
the pure-food-and-drugs bill in late February by a vote of 63-4. However,
the pure-food-and-drugs bill included no provision for meat inspection.
Accordingly, Senator Albert Beveridge of Indiana, a progressive Republican,
proposed legislation requiring federal inspection of all meat that moved
in interstate commerce and directing the Department of Agriculture to
regulate conditions in the packinghouses. Beveridge described his bill
as "the most pronounced extension of federal power in every direction
ever enacted." Roosevelt, still withholding his report, threatened
to release it unless the Senate took action on Beveridge's bill. The Senate
approved the bill.
The meat packers now joined other food processing companies in focusing
on the House of Representatives, where both bills now lay. When powerful
House members sought to dilute the Beveridge bill, Roosevelt released
the report, which, he proclaimed, clearly demonstrated that conditions
in the stockyards were "revolting." The strategy did not work.
Opposition continued. Finally a compromise emerged—Beveridge's bill
had provided that a fee would be assessed on every animal slaughtered,
to pay for the inspection and regulation, but the compromise specified
that the costs would be borne by the federal government; Beveridge had
wanted a date to be stamped on all canned meat, but the compromise omitted
any requirement for dating. Nonetheless, Beveridge and Roosevelt agreed
that the compromise was better than no regulation at all. Roosevelt signed
both the Meat Inspection Act and the Pure Food and Drug Act into law on
June 30, 1906. He described those two laws, together with a bill to regulate
railroad rates, as marking "a noteworthy advance in the policy of
securing Federal supervision and control over corporations." Historians
have agreed with Roosevelt's analysis, citing the three bills passed in
1906 as major early steps in the development of federal regulation of
a wide range of economic activity.
Though less than six months had passed from Doubleday's publication of
The Jungle to the signing of the Meat Inspection Act, Sinclair
was disappointed that his book had produced only a federal law regulating
meatpackers and not a surge of popular support for socialism. "I
aimed at the public's heart," he famously observed, "and by
accident I hit it in the stomach." Though the book failed to create
a surge of converts to socialism, it was very good for Upton Sinclair,
who now, at the age of twenty-eight, catapulted into international prominence.
Sinclair's career as an author was both long and productive. By the time
of his death in 1968, he had written more than ninety books, with translations
into nearly fifty languages, and had won a Pulitzer Prize. He had dabbled
in politics as a Socialist until 1934, when he changed his party registration
and won the Democratic nomination for governor of California. His campaign
was based on a program he called EPIC (End Poverty in California), but
he lost when his Republican opponent mounted a highly sophisticated, media-based
negative campaign that some scholars have seen as the origins of modern
media-driven campaigns.
Theodore Roosevelt remained unhappy with the constant journalistic exposés.
In the midst of the controversy over meatpacking, on April 14, 1906, he
gave a speech that has become known as "The Man with the Muck-Rake."
In that speech, he discussed journalists who specialized in exposés:
In Bunyan’s “Pilgrim’s Progress” you
may recall the description of the Man with the Muck-rake, the man who
could look no way but downward, with the muck-rake [manure rake] in his
hand; who was offered a celestial crown for his muck-rake, but who would
neither look up nor regard the crown he was offered, but continued to
rake to himself the filth of the floor.
In “Pilgrim’s Progress” the Man with the Muck-rake is
set forth as the example of him whose vision is fixed on carnal instead
of on spiritual things. Yet he also typifies the man who in this life
consistently refuses to see aught that is lofty, and fixes his eyes with
solemn intentness only on that which is vile and debasing.
Roosevelt intended his speech as a rebuke to those, as he said, who engaged
in "gross and reckless assaults on character," and not to those
who engaged in the "relentless exposure of and attack upon every evil
man whether politician or business man, every evil practice, whether in
politics, in business, or in social life." However, it was the metaphor
of the Man with the Muck-rake that captured public attention. Though Roosevelt
intended his comparison as an insult, the title "muckraker" was
taken up by many journalists as a badge of honor.
The modern Food and Drug Administration dates to the regulatory functions
assigned to the Bureau of Chemistry of the Agriculture Department by the
Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906. In 1938, Congress significantly expanded
the regulatory functions of the 1906 law and extended FDA's authority over
processed foods. In 1990 Congress passed the Nutrition Labeling and Education
Act, which required food products, including processed meat, to provide
basic nutritional information. Today, though many manufacturers now include
dates on their food products, there is still no agreed upon standard for
the dating of food products. And today the media still carries occasional
stories of contaminated food products, both meat and vegetables, that have
caused sickness and even death, or of the discovery in the food chain of
an animal infected with bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), commonly
known as mad-cow disease. Reading The Jungle
The Jungle continues to be in print, in two different versions.
All but one edition now in print are based on the 1906 Doubleday version.
Among these, the edition published by the University of Illinois Press in
1988 provides a useful introduction by the historian James R. Barrett, in
which he explores some of the aspects of life in Packingtown in the early
twentieth century that Sinclair missed. The edition published by Bedford/St.
Martin's Press in 2005 includes both an introduction by the historian Christopher
Phelps and also the report ordered by President Theodore Roosevelt.
The other version of the book appears in just one of the editions that are
currently in print, published by See Sharp Press in 2003. This edition is
based on the serialized text published in One-Hoss Philosophy in 1905. In
its introduction, Kathleen De Grave, a literature professor, argues that
the Doubleday version represents a "lesser book" than the serialized
version and that Sinclair felt compelled to censor himself to secure commercial
publication; she also implies that the Doubleday version was "produced
under coercion, directly or indirectly, for political or economic reasons."
Barrett and Phelps dispute these conclusions, arguing that there is no clear
evidence that Sinclair's revisions were anything more than an effort to
prepare a sprawling serial for publication as a book. Phelps also points
out that, after 1906, the book was published in numerous editions during
Sinclair's lifetime, including four self-published editions, but that Sinclair
never sought to restore any of the text he'd cut or altered. For Phelps's
argument, see "The Fictitious Suppression of Upton Sinclair's The
Jungle," History News Network, June 26, 2006, online at http://hnn.us/articles/27227.html.
For a good, brief discussion of the politics of the Meat Inspection Act,
see Lewis L. Gould, The Presidency of Theodore Roosevelt (University
Press of Kansas, 1991).
Robert W. Cherny is professor of history at San Francisco
State University. He is the author of several books and articles on American
politics, 1865-1940, including American Politics in the Gilded Age,
1868-1900; A Righteous Cause: The Life of William Jennings Bryan;
and San Francisco, 1865-1932, with William Issel. He is also
co-author of two textbooks: Making America and Competing
Visions: A History of California.
|